I had more or less the same discussion with both Grok and Gemini about the origin of the universe and causality, asking them both if time was a property of the universe, then the universe can't possibly have a causal origin, right? and moving from there. I'm not well educated in quantum physics, but I was interested in how my conjecture on the topic mirrored if any scientists and philosophers in the field.
For my money, Grok is smarter.
When I asked about time emergent from a higher-order, or integrated realm where information is encoded logically but without dimension, and time being the differential axis along which a derivation of that higher-order realm is projected, or derived out in what we experience as time, both Grok and Gemini pointed to similarities in the works of St Augustine.
But at that point, once I started to flesh out the conversation with theorizing, Grok kinda started to diverge. It came back discussing similarities with Bohm's later work (he did a lot of work on the ...
Was looking into Arday's work output
Cambridge is down bad, you guys. I don't even think the field of sociology is coherent atp, is the entire field this masturbatory crap?
Here are the titles of various scholarly articles written by Arday as reported by Cambridge (a number of scholarly articles are available via google search):
-
Understanding the experiences related to mental health amongst 16 – 24 year olds who feel under represented; a narrative inquiry study
-
Exploring experiences of mental health challenges in under-represented young people (aged 16–24 years) in England: a narrative inquiry protocol
-
FOREWORD: “Hello to You out there in Normal Land”
-
We See Things They’ll Never See: Love, Hope, and Neurodiversity
-
The routes to intellectual authority in a prior colonial empire: continued racialised, geopolitical inequalities in the academic staff composition and employment conditions of UK universities
-
Data snapshots of the access and participation of ‘women’ academics in UK ...
